 |
| Brexit - Voting to Leave |
Brexit surprises - the ‘Out’ result itself, who voted out
and the ensuing political turmoil.
Generally, the media has characterised those who voted out
as the disenfranchised white working class, and given the spread of the ‘Out’
vote, this applies to most of the country.
The rise in attacks and abuse against Asians, Blacks and Europeans
has been swift. Many column inches have been devoted to ‘Shock’, pointing to
the effects of austerity and the words of grey, white people in small towns.
But England and its people hasn't substantially changed
over the years and certainly not since the EU referendum vote. For some, it
would seem, are now more comfortable being openly racist because, through the
vote, they believe most people think like them.
And the fault for this lies squarely with the leaders of
this country.
Recently, too many politicians have taken Race and used it
to demonise as a cover for the negative consequences of their policies or the
deficit in their thinking.
They have 'weaponised' it.
Race played a major part in last year’s General Election
with the main parties all promising to be tough on immigrants and doing nothing
to dampen down the resulting xenophobia.
The Labour Party even produced its
infamous 'Controls on Immigration' mugs.
The recent London Mayoral campaign was openly Islamophobic.
The use of high levels of fear by BOTH the Remain and
Brexit campaigns was new, with Brexit basing their fear platform on immigration
and Europeans.
That immigrants and Europe have been the main cause of
England's problems – lack of services, housing, jobs - was not only a central
plank of Brexit but also often used by the government over the years.
By voting 'Out', the majority of the public accepted these
argument.
What have politicians been doing to allay these fears?
Nothing.
Leadership battles have turned politicians inward instead of outwards
to the country. No-one is trying to close the wounds this campaign has opened.
A pox on all their houses. Blame for this situation should
be pointed in the right direction.
So what does this mean for the Greens?
- The national leadership to be much more vocal about their anti-racist policies and practices.
- Hold any racist, xenophobic actions and policies of the other parties to account.
- Local parties to be much faster to condemn racist incidents wherever they happen in the country.
- Show more diversity in its leadership platform.Its done that relatively successfully over the last couple of years with Shahrar Ali and Amelia Womack presenting a different complexion to its membership, Natalie Bennett covering almost every inch of the country in support of local members and Caroline Lucas retaining her popularity with the press.
If though, as a party, we are going back to having a white,
middle aged, middle class leadership, that is a statement in itself.
