Since Manchester City Council evicted the camps in St
Peters Square, St Anne's Square and King Street [1], the few individuals living
under the flyer has grown into a small shelter. They call it 'The Ark'.
That shelter is now currently under threat of eviction by
Manchester Metropolitan University and Manchester City Council [2].
Its inhabitants, about 12 people, were served legal papers
last week and are due in court from 7th September.
Deyika Nzeribe from Hulme Green Party said "That
Manchester City Council is continuing its campaign to harass the homeless of
Manchester is as scandalous as it is immoral. The fact that Manchester
Metropolitan University is a partner in this action is deeply disappointing.
"It is common for the homeless of Manchester have to
live together for protection from the attacks that they frequently endure in
the city centre. The shelter, a mile from Piccadilly, can hardly be considered
'political' or 'campaigning'."
Over the six months Manchester City Council has embarked on
dual high profile campaigns. The first is to highlight the proposed 1 billion
pounds worth of housing investment planned for central Manchester [3]. The
Council is planning to use the £300 million pound housing investment fund
granted as part of the Devolution deal to do this [4]. So far, 22% of that
funding has been committed to support luxury housing within similar
developments earmarked [5].
The second is the pursuit of Manchester's homeless. The Council has spent over £100,000 on legal
fees [6] to gain injunctions to move the homeless camps from the city centre.
This was soon after cutting council funding to organisations supporting the
homeless [7].
Manchester City Council and Manchester Metropolitan
University are some of the largest institutions who, between them have recently
spent hundreds of millions on buildings [8] or promoting buildings [9]. The
pursuit and harassment of the homeless and particularly the Ark is shameful.
Both institutions should stop this action immediately and put those resources
to helping people get off the streets.
Notes
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/homeless-camp-sets-up-king-9875548
- http://www.mancunianmatters.co.uk/content/050974232-manchester-homelessness-crisis-ark-shelter-plea-public-support-after-council
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/future-manchester-revealed-vertical-village-9604147
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/300m-housing-fund-designed-unlock-9570783
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/greater-manchester-councils-hand-out-9984274
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/bill-manchester-homelessness-protest-exceeds-9534300
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-homeless-campaigners-could-end-9535878
- http://www.mmu.ac.uk/news/news-items/3417/
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/special-report-shock-rise-manchester-9363644
There use to be some homeless people under the Railway viaduct beside the multi-story car park, Charles Street. The camp was cleared and Gates erected stopping even pedestrians using the footpath. I do not know if this was done under @ManCityCouncil orders or the University of Manchester? But another camp was set-up under the railway viaduct just off Princess Street, near to the Old Garrett (now renamed the Garrett). I do not know if this camp will come under the same order, as that on Oxford Road?
ReplyDeleteAs I have informed @ManCityCouncil, there is over 5,000 empty dwellings in Manchester, of which 2,600 are long term empty. The @ManCityCouncil, response is, they have a department dealig with empty homes! It seems there are more interested in removing the homeless of our streets. So as not to tarnish the nonsense headline news, that Manchester is the best place to live. It might be, if you fully employed in a fairly well paid job. But 55% of Mancunians are 'economically inactive' and are struggling, sometimes on nothing (due to sanctions), hence the rise in homelessness. Which the @ManCityCouncil is trying to brush under the carpet.
Thanks for the comment, and its a good point on the empty properties, worth further investigation.
ReplyDelete